Saakuru Protocol (SKR)

Did you know a whopping $1-2 billion a month is already flowing through the Seeker ecosystem? 📱📈

The numbers are getting genuinely impressive for an ecosystem barely a year old.

So how could this impact $SKR, the token powering it all? 👇

✅ The volume is already massive
→ $1-2B in transaction volume each month
→ And it's from just ~150k devices
→ SeedVault signing isn't even tracked yet
→ So the actual volume is much bigger

✅ This is how it becomes a real business
→ Solana Mobile can take a small fee on all that volume
→ At $1-2B volume per month
→ Even a fraction of a percent is serious revenue
→ And the more devices sold
→ The more volume, the more revenue
→ All scaling with almost no added cost

✅ And here's where $SKR comes in
→ That fee revenue has to go somewhere
→ If Solana Mobile routes it into $SKR buybacks
→ Real volume creates constant, recurring buy pressure
→ Revenue-backed demand
→ And it compounds as the device base grows

imo one of the most underrated ecosystems at the moment.

People are saying

Let's talk about why $SKR is down ~85% from ATH - and how to FIX it.

Plenty of projects have integrated SKR by now, for utility or payments.

So what's going on? 👇

The integrations are real and long-term bullish. But right now, that usage isn't flowing back to the token.

Usage is growing. Value capture isn't - yet.

SKR is plugged into a growing list of apps. If even a handful become breakout dApps, SKR rides their growth.

That's the bet: usage now, value capture when those apps take off.

But imo a layer on top would make it stronger:

A tiny fee on dApp Store purchases - 1-2%, nothing near Apple's 30% - routed into SKR buyback-and-burn.

Every in-app purchase and paid download buys SKR and burns it.

Devs keep almost everything, but ecosystem growth now feeds the token directly.

Right now it all rests on goodwill - devs use SKR because they choose to, not because they have to.

A fee layer makes that value capture built-in, not optional.

Wdyt? 🤔