Last year when Hyper took off, I was watching off-chain and thought, "Isn't it just buyback and burn, the same old trick?" The market gave us a harsh lesson.
Later, after reviewing, I realized: buyback and burn is indeed an old trick, but the difference between real execution and fake is on the order of ten times.
So this time, seeing $ANTFUN, I first checked the data before discussing with you.
Several hard metrics:
1. Burn intensity. 97% of platform profits are used for buyback and burn; this is not just a token gesture, it’s almost all the earnings being thrown back.
2. Execution status. Since the launch on June 2, cumulative burn has approached 1.8 billion tokens. The mechanism is running, not just a line in the whitepaper.
3. Funding situation. Having just completed a $5 million financing, the team is not short of money, making it less likely to tamper with the burn.
4. Price verification. It has already broken through previous highs, and the market has voted with real cash.
What Hyper taught me: when supply continuously decreases while business keeps growing, the market will eventually reprice; it’s just a matter of when. ANT
ANTFUN is now on that path, and it is still in the early stage.
This time I don’t want to be just an observer. You can verify the burn data yourself; everything is fully public on-chain.
CA: CWZ6BsdnjkDVTGkmL6bGbJXXig6ceef12KvyGQW14cMt
Not investment advice, DYOR.
